Lack Of Legal Standing Apparently Not A Concern To Some Foreclosing Lenders; Would Rather Play The Odds That Homeowners Won't Contest Legal Actions
- [Attorney Patrick] Begos’ firm [Begos, Horgan & Brown] has attempted to carve out a niche with banks to review their troubled loans and to ensure that the banks had standing to file foreclosure proceedings.
- Earlier this year, firm member Christopher Brown got a case against his homeowner client dismissed in New Haven Superior Court because Brown showed that the plaintiff mortgage company couldn’t prove it held the mortgage at the time it filed suit.(1)
- Despite that outcome, banks didn’t bite on Begos’s pitch, telling him that they would rather play the odds that most homeowners won’t contest foreclosures in court.(2)
Source: Adapting On The Fly (Solos, small firms make quick changes in bad economy).
For posts that reference the failure of some mortgage lenders and their attorneys to prove ownership of the promissory note when starting foreclosure actions, Go Here, Go Here, Go Here, and Go Here.
(1) See Connecticut Law Tribune: Shaky Standing (Foreclosure cases identify shoddy record-keeping in mortgage industry).
(2) Even if the homeowners fail to contest foreclosures, a lender's lack of legal standing in bringing an action leaves open a possible future attack that the foreclosure judgment obtained in a court that lacked jurisdiction is void, thereby raising the possibility that judgments obtained and foreclosure sales that have already taken place could be voided or otherwise set aside. Reportedly, the issue of void foreclosures where lenders allegedly lacked legal standing has recently been raised in a Massachusetts lawsuit. The suit seeks to set aside past foreclosures involving two lenders, halt any actions they currently have in the pipeline, and seeks class action status. See Thousands Of Foreclosures Are Void, Says Massachusetts Class Action Demanding Lenders & Their Lawyers Prove Note Ownership. missing mortgage foreclosure docs gamma
<< Home