Attorneys, Law Students From Seton Hall Pro Bono Program Intervene On Behalf Of Elderly Couple In Equity Stripping, Foreclosure Rescue Scam
For the CSJ press release, see CSJ Stays Foreclosure, Charges Mortgage Scam.
(1) According to the press release, the Counterclaim filed on behalf of the elderly homeowners by CSJ against Third-Party defendants (a disbarred lawyer, a subprime lender, and others) includes, in part, a petition for relief for multiple violations of:
- New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act ( N.J.S.A. § 56:8-1, et seq.),
- New Jersey Civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ( N.J.S.A. § 2C:41-2( c ) ),
- New Jersey Fair Foreclosure Act ( N.J.S.A. § 2A:50-56, et seq. ), and,
- Federal Truth in Lending Act ( 15 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq. ).
Reportedly also included in the countersuit are a number of common law claims. The pleading also charges that the foreclosing entity, assignee U.S. Bank:
- Lacks standing to enforce the Note securing the Property because U.S. Bank is not a proper assignee and holder of the Note pursuant to N.J.S.A. § 12A:3-201 and Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code ( “UCC” );
- Is not a “holder in due course” and therefore is vicariously liable for the elderly couple's claims and defenses against the originators of the mortgage, Credit Suisse Financial Corporation and its agent, ANM Funding, LLC;
- Lacks standing to seek foreclosure because the mortgage was not assigned to it until after about four months after the foreclosure action was filed. N.J.S.A. § 46:9-9 requires mortgage assignments to be in writing.
<< Home