Lack Of Diligence Means Another Process Server Screw-Up, Another Void Foreclosure
The case involved a permanent resident of Canada who owned a second home in Spring Hill, Florida, and who was facing foreclosure on that home. At the time of the attempted service of process, the home was unoccupied. Because the process server couldn't find the homeowner after a couple of attempts at the premises, and an attempt at a second location, a decision was made to serve the homeowner by publication of a legal notice in the local
In reversing the lower court and deciding that service of process was no good in this case, the court ruled that the process server failed to meet the minimum requirements for conducting a "diligent search and inquiry" for the whereabouts of the homeowner prior to resorting to service by publication.(2)
For the details on the process server's lack of diligence in conducting a search and inquiry in connection with the homeowner's whereabouts in this case (sorry, no "easy-to-read" media report for this story; court decision only), see Godsell v. United Guar. Residential Ins., 923 So. 2d 1209; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3884; 31 Fla. L. Weekly D 812 (5th DCA 2006).
Go here and go here for other posts on foreclosures involving faulty notifications to property owners.
Go here for other posts on process server screw ups.
(1) Pursuant to Sections 49.021-.041, Florida Statutes.
(2) The court indicated that the plaintiff must prove that it made “an honest and conscientious effort, reasonably appropriate to the circumstances, to acquire the information necessary to fully comply with the controlling statutes,” and that "it is basic that to constitute diligent search and inquiry to discover the whereabouts of a party, that inquiry should be made of persons likely or presumed to known [sic] such whereabouts." foreclosure faulty notice ScrewUpProcessServing
<< Home