Nevada Lawsuit Alleges Lender Used Deceptive & Unfair Practices, Lacked Good Faith When Making Unsustainable Home Loans; Seeks Class Action Status
- The foreclosure crisis is far from over in southern Nevada. Now a group of homeowners are fighting back against one lender. They've filed a class action lawsuit to stop foreclosures and to get restitution for those who've already lost their homes. They are going after California's Indymac, one of the first banks to fail during the meltdown.
- The lawsuit claims the lender did not deal in good faith with their borrowers and used deceptive and unfair practices. "They focused in on minority groups and attempted to sell them on loans that they knew that those borrowers could never ever satisfy," said attorney Matthew
Callister.(1) Callister is representing the lawsuit against Indymac, who was taken over by OneWest Bank. He says tens of thousands of valley homeowners have loans through the company and he wants to stop more from becoming victims of bad lending practices.
For more, see Las Vegas Attorney Files Class Action Against Home Lender.
For other posts on homeowners using state & federal consumer protection laws to stave off foreclosures, Go Here, Go Here, and Go Here.
(1) Last year, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the making of subprime loans that lenders either knew or should have known were unsustainable constituted unfair and deceptive business practices in violation of the applicable state consumer protection statute (M.G.L. c. 93A, §2). See:
- The National Law Journal: Mass. High Court Upholds Order Restricting Subprime Lender From Foreclosing,
- Court ruling: Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Fremont Investment & Loan, 452 Mass. 733; 897 N.E.2d 548; 2008 Mass. LEXIS 797 (Ma. 2008) (for a possibly easier to read version, try here). UndoMortgageLoans TILAdelta
<< Home