Welcome to The Home Equity Theft Reporter, a blog dedicated to informing the consumer public and the legal profession about Home Equity Theft issues. This blog will consist of information describing the various forms of Home Equity Theft and links to news reports & other informational sources from throughout the country about the victims of Home Equity Theft and what government authorities and others are doing about it.
Wednesday, October 28, 2015
NJ AG Reaches Settlement w/ Four Real Estate Operators Resolving Allegations Of Deception, Misrepresentations Made In Targeting Ex-Homeowners For Foreclosure Sale "Surplus Funds" Ripoffs
From the Office of the New Jersey Attorney General:
Three companies and one individual that advertised, offered for sale and sold services to locate “surplus funds” or other property owed to consumers have entered into settlements with the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs.
According to the terms of the settlements, the Division of Consumer Affairs identified violations of the Consumer Fraud Act and/or the Advertising Regulations arising from the advertisement, offering for sale and/or sale of services to locate, deliver, recover or assist in the recovery of property by the following:
U.S. Financial Funding LLC and Jeffrey Richman, of Charlotte, North Carolina;
Capital Recovery III, LLC, Capital Recovery Inc. II, Charles Demes and Alan Dumond of Chicago, Illinois;
Jose A. Danoys d/b/a “JD Assets Recovery” of Old Bridge, New Jersey; and
Hunterdon Legal Service LLC, d/b/a “Superior Court Services,” and Steven C. Searfoss, d/b/a “Steven C. Thomas,” of Flemington, New Jersey.
Under the terms of the settlements, these businesses were collectively assessed $309,673.33 in civil penalties, disgorgement to consumers, and reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs.
“Surplus funds” are funds remaining after a property foreclosure sale and all payments ordered by the Court have been made, which can often total in the thousands of dollars. The homeowner is entitled to apply for these funds if they exist.
“These settlements resolve allegations that these businesses falsely represented that consumers needed their assistance to obtain surplus funds from foreclosure sales. Homeowners who have lost their homes in foreclosure should be aware that they do not need to pay a business in order to apply for money they are rightfully entitled to,” Acting Attorney General John J. Hoffman said.
“Some businesses allegedly convinced consumers to pay thousands of dollars for unnecessary help obtaining ‘surplus funds’ by making misrepresentations and creating confusion,” said Steve Lee, Acting Director of the Division of Consumer Affairs. “Consumers should be aware of such illegal practices whenever they are going through a foreclosure.”
As to U.S Financial Funding, the alleged violations included misrepresenting that surplus funds and other property would be lost to the government if not recovered quickly; using contracts that failed to set forth the consumer’s share of the surplus funds; and charging fees that were more than 35% of the value of the property recovered. In the settlement, U.S. Financial Funding was assessed $71,250.77, of which $66,250.77 is suspended and will become vacated if it follows the terms of its settlement with the Division for the next three years. As part of the settlement, U.S. Financial Funding also agreed to discontinue doing business in New Jersey.
As to Capital Recovery, the alleged violations included failing to identify the property to be recovered in its solicitation letters; using contracts that failed to set forth the consumer’s share of the surplus funds; and charging fees for the recovery of property that were excessive or unjust. In the settlement, Capital Recovery was assessed $97,197.30, of which $40,000 is suspended and will become vacated if the terms of the settlement with the Division are successfully met for the next three years.
As to JD Assets Recovery, the alleged violations included using a solicitation letter which misrepresented that “time is of the essence” and that after a period of time the property would be permanently lost; and using contracts that failed to set forth the consumer’s share of the surplus funds after deduction of its recovery. In the settlement, JD Assets Recovery was assessed $36,000, of which $30,000 is suspended and will become vacated if the terms of its settlement with the Division are successfully met for the next three years.
As to Hunterdon Legal Service, the alleged violations included using the term “Superior Court Services” in its solicitation letters and contracts, thus suggesting an affiliation with the Superior Court, which was not the case; misrepresenting that it was entitled to a fixed percentage of any property to be recovered; and charging fees for recovery of property that were excessive or unjust. In the settlement, Hunterdon Legal Service was assessed $105,225.26, of which $40,000 is suspended and will become vacated if terms of its settlement with the Division are successfully met for the next three years.
Homeowners can apply for surplus funds themselves, by contacting the Trust Fund Unit of the State Superior Court at (609) 292-4012. To learn more about surplus funds, please see the Division of Consumer Affairs’ Consumer Brief online.
CBC News: Betrayal of Trust (A CBC investigation reveals how lawyers across Canada have misappropriated and mishandled clients money, to the tune of tens of millions of dollars, or sometimes even charging vulnerable people top dollar for shoddy services)
Land Contract/Contract For Deed/Rent-To-Own Rackets
The New York Times: The Housing Trap (In the wake of the housing crisis, low-income families have turned to seller financing to buy homes but these deals can be a money trap)
Beware The Fine Print: Consumers Forced To Sign Away Their Rights To Use Court System
The NY Times: Arbitration Everywhere, Stacking the Deck of Justice(Part 1 in series examining how clauses buried in tens of millions of contracts have deprived Americans of one of their most fundamental constitutional rights: their day in court)
Foreclosure Mills' Abysmal Record In Complying With New NYS Foreclosure Requirements
Justice Deceived: How Large Foreclosure Firms Subvert State Regulations Protecting Homeowners
MFY Legal Services Report On Questionable Practices By Process Servers In Debt Collection Cases
Justice Disserved: A Preliminary Analysis of the Exceptionally
Low Appearance Rate by Defendants in Lawsuits Filed in the Civil Court of the City of New York
Mortgage Mess Redux: Robo-Signers Return (A Reuters investigation finds that many banks are still employing the controversial foreclosure practices that sparked a major outcry last year)
CNN Video: As Foreclosures Mount, Florida Court Turns To 'Rocket Docket'
The Wall Street Journal: A Florida Court's 'Rocket Docket' Blasts Through Foreclosure Cases (2 Questions, 15 Seconds, 45 Days to Get Out; 'What's to Talk About?' Says a Judge)
"Produce The Note" Strategy When Dealing With Missing Promissory Notes In Foreclosure Actions
ABC Video: Fighting Against Foreclosure (Some homeowners have found a new tactic to keep the banks at bay)
<< Home