Screwed Over But Undeterred By Erroneous Ruling In Foreclosure Case Involving Standing-Lacking Bankster & Knowledge-Lacking Florida Trial Judge, Justice-Seeking Pro Se Homeowner/Couple Score Win On Appeal!

1. another standing-lacking bankster,
2. another erroneous ruling by a Florida trial judge (the guilty party this time is a Walton County, Florida Circuit Court judge) in a foreclosure case,
3. another appeals court reversal,
4. lost promissory note,
5. successor-in-interest failed to prove original plaintiff was entitled to enforce the note at the time possession was lost.

I think that's it.

For the court ruling, see Seidler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1D14-2569 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 12, 2015) (reversed).

Oh, and by the way, the homeowners represented themselves in court, at least on their appeal.