Steel City Joins Two Others In Pennsylvania, Over Three Dozen Municipalities Nationwide In Prohibiting "Source Of Income" Housing Discrimination

In Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, NewsWorks (WHYY News) reports:

• Pittsburgh City Council has passed a bill that adds source of income to the list of protected classes under fair housing laws. The ordinance prohibits landlords from turning away potential tenants based on their participation in the Housing Choice Voucher program -- which helps low-income families and individuals pay rent in the private housing sector — all other things being equal.
  
  The program, also known as Section 8, serves 5,200 families in the city.
  
  Councilman Ricky Burgess, who sponsored the bill as part of a legislative package aimed at addressing inequities in the Steel City, said landlords “use the Section 8 voucher as a scarlet letter.” He added that rejecting tenants based on their source of income is “really just a vehicle for other types of discrimination,” like racial bias.
  
  Pittsburgh is the third municipality in the Commonwealth to include source-of-income in its housing discrimination legislation, after Philadelphia and State College.(1)
  
  Anti-discrimination legislation like this can be hard to enforce. If a person feels like a landlord discriminated against him, he can file a complaint with the Commission on Human Relations, which then investigates the claim.
  
  Stacy Pethia, the Landlord Outreach Coordinator for the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh, speaking before the bill passed, said the main change would be that landlords could no longer place rental ads that say “no Section 8.” She said that “would maybe open the door to people…doors that our participants don’t normally access,” and allow Section 8 participants to at least get applications in, which could result in housing for some.
  
  While some research shows that protecting people based on source of income can have moderately positive outcomes, advocates say such laws work better when enforcing agencies have teeth and landlords are aware they’re being diligently watched. In Philadelphia — which has included source of income protections in its fair housing laws since 1980 — rental ads on sites like Craigslist regularly include language like “No Section 8,” though that’s illegal.
  
  But Burgess said the bill is symbolic, too: “It will open up a larger discussion about how we protect and how we incentivize success and create opportunities for people who may be in low-income situations,” he said.
  
  Meanwhile, there are softer efforts underway to convince landlords to work with more Section 8 voucher holders. For example, Pethia leads outreach and education programs geared towards landlords who are on the fence about renting to Section 8 tenants. “A lot of the voucher holders, they just have a bad image associated with them,” she said, something that’s not based in fact.

Source: New Pittsburgh ordinance bars discrimination against Section 8 renters.

------------------------

(1) Reportedly, there are over three dozen municipalities nationwide that prohibit "source of income" housing discrimination, according to one report. See Landlord discrimination against Section 8 vouchers outlawed:

• Twelve states, nine counties and 18 [at least] cities have outlawed discrimination against Section 8 tenants.

In addition, there is at least one state, Texas, that has already passed a law prohibiting cities throughout the state from passing or enforcing such ordinances. See The Austin Chronicle: (Not) For Rent (New state law blocks Austin housing ordinance):

• With an exception carved out for military veterans, Senate Bill 267 by Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, bars cities from adopting or enforcing ordinances that compel landlords to accept renters who pay with federal housing assistance – in other words, landlords can keep on discriminating against the disadvantaged. "Businesses should not be forced to partner with a governmental agency that significantly impacts its flexibility and day-to-day operations," said Perry: Accepting vouchers was never intended to be mandatory.