Judge Jams Foreclosing Lender's Improper Grab For Excess Insurance Cash On Fire-Destroyed Home
Even though it already had acquired title to the property (sans improvements) by bidding $99,700 at the sale, the lender nevertheless demanded $134,800 of the insurance proceeds, the full amount of the debt it claimed was owed to them by the homeowners (and without reduction for its $99,700 bid). Conversely, the Trustee and the homeowners claimed that the lender was only entitled to the amount of its secured debt, reduced by the "credit bid" of $99,700.
The bankruptcy judge agreed with the Trustee and the homeowners, saying that the debt owed to the lender must be reduced by the amount that it bid for the home at the foreclosure sale, and the fact that the lender was clueless that the home went up in smoke a month before the sale was the lender's tough luck. Among other things, the judge stated in his decision:
- [T]he Bank here elected to foreclose, bidding $99,771.17 for the property, even though it could have pursued the insurance proceeds instead. It is unfortunate that the Bank did not know that the Property had been destroyed by a fire when the Bank foreclosed, but the rule of caveat emptor applies to foreclosure sales, and the Court cannot protect the Bank from the consequences of that rule or the Bank’s failure to conduct even the slightest due diligence before it bid at the foreclosure sale.
To view the Federal bankruptcy judge's entire decision, see
<< Home