Attorney Malpractice For Obtaining Loan Modification From Lender Who Can't Prove It Owns The Promissory Note?

An article in the Decenber, 2008 issue of Trial Magazine highlights problems faced by lenders as a result of the mortgage securitization process that leaves them in a difficult spot whether they're attempting a foreclosure action against, or a loan modification with, a financially strapped homeowner. It also raises a question regarding an attorney's professional responsibility when representing a homeowner in these situations.

• [B]ecause of lenders’ bundling and reselling of mortgages, [promissory] notes are often lost, misplaced, or corrupted. As a result, many lenders can’t prove that they are owed payments and entitled to foreclose.

***

• “Losing a note is like losing cash,” said Mitchell Roth, a lawyer in Sherman Oaks, California. “The right to payment depends, with limited exceptions, upon the actual possession of the note. To defend against a foreclosure, the first line of defense is, ‘Show me the note.’ And show me how you have the right to payment under the note by proper endorsement or assignment.”

***

• Roth said confusion about the note holder is one reason lawyers should counsel their clients to avoid loan workouts or other negotiations offered by their banks or mortgage companies.

• “Why should we renegotiate unless we know that we are negotiating with the actual holder of the note?” he said. “In fact, I think lawyers are committing malpractice if they are negotiating with an entity that is not the original holder in due course in possession of the instrument.”

For more, see Homeowners bank on new ways to fight foreclosures (article reproduced and appearing on the website of The Consumer Warning Network).

In related posts, see:

• 12-29-08: Foreclosing Lender Can't Prove Ownership Of The Note? So What's The Big Deal???,
• 12-28-08: Judges, Homeowner Attorneys Begin To Wonder How To Do A Loan Modification When Lender Can't Prove Ownership Of Promissory Note?KappaMtgDocsMissing