Thursday, June 11, 2009

California Lawmakers Seek To Crackdown On Foreclosing Banks Forcing Buyers Of Repossessed Homes To Use Title & Escrow Firms Picked By Lender

The underreported (and unprosecuted) scam currently being perpetrated by lenders looking to unload foreclosed homes whereby they force the buyers of those homes to use their (the lender's) title insurance and escrow companies(1) is now drawing attention from the California state legislature, as evidenced by this excerpt in a recent story reported by the Merced Sun Star:
  • A bill to help California's smaller title companies compete in the foreclosure resale market has cleared the Assembly and is now in the Senate. [...] The bill's passage would be a boost to title companies that have been hard-up for business as the market has shifted from real estate agents selling new homes for developers to unloading foreclosed ones for banks. The bill, AB 957 [the Buyer’s Choice Act, go here to check bill status], would establish penalties for banks that force buyers to use a particular title and escrow company.

***

  • The practice of forcing buyers to use certain title insurance companies is illegal under the federal government's Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, though there's been little enforcement. State leaders are looking to crack down by allowing buyers to seek a fine against banks that forced them to use a particular title company.

***

  • Banks would be forced to pay the buyer three times what was spent on the title and escrow services. Locally, title transaction fees can run about $1,000, though agents have seen bills double or triple that from other firms. In such instances, banks could be paying thousands back to the home buyer. [...] So far, there hasn't been any opposition to the bill. It passed the Assembly with a 77-0 vote. No title companies or lobbyists have come out against it.

For the story, see Galgiani's title bill on its way to state Senate.

Go here for other posts involving legal issues related to title insurance.

(1) Lenders holding foreclosed homes with potentially defective titles as a result of errors, irregularities, and other sloppiness in the foreclosure process (ie. lenders lacking standing to foreclose, failure to physically possess the mortgage note when foreclosing, failure to satisfy all "notice" requirements in the legal process, etc.), and who are using "friendly" title & escrow companies over whom they can possibly exert control in the title-clearing & sale-closing process (for the possible purpose of "slipping something past" an unwitting home buyer), appear to be among those that could be affected by this proposed law. title insurance legal issues