Manhattan Feds Bag Trio In Alleged Foreclosure Rescue Scam That Used False Oral Promises Of Loan Modifications Or Short Sale-Leasebacks To Trick Distressed Homeowners Into Unwittingly Sign Away Ownership & Control Of Their Homes, Then Give Them The Boot
- Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, [and four others] announced that SAMANTHA BOUBERT, CHRISTINE MAHARAJ, and OWEN REID were taken into custody this week for participating in a scheme to fraudulently induce distressed homeowners to sell their homes to a company associated with the defendants.
***Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said: “As alleged, these defendants preyed upon distressed homeowners and, through lies and front companies, tricked people into giving up their homes. The damage allegedly caused by these defendants went far beyond financial harm; as charged, their schemes often resulted in victims being evicted from their homes.”
***From January 2013 through May 2015, SAMANTHA BOUBERT, CHRISTINE MAHARAJ, OWEN REID, and others, (collectively, the “Hillside Fraud Team”) targeted distressed homeowners in the New York City area, including the Bronx, Brooklyn, and Queens. The Hillside Fraud Team, which primarily operated from a Hillside Avenue address, tricked and coerced homeowners into selling or deeding their properties to a Hillside business they controlled.
The Hillside Fraud Team sent mailings to the owners of distressed properties on the letterhead of the Homeowners Assistance Services of New York (“HASNY”), inviting the homeowners to seek assistance from HASNY to avoid foreclosure and save their homes. The Hillside Fraud Team also hired telemarketers to contact homeowners and to invite them to meet with HASNY representatives to learn more about avoiding foreclosure.
REID and others trained and directed the telemarketers to appeal to the emotions of the owners of distressed properties. They developed a script for telemarketers to use in their calls, which included, in substance, a statement that a short sale would be a means for homeowners to lower their monthly payments and still remain in their homes.
Many of the homeowners who sought assistance from HASNY met with a member of the Hillside Fraud team, who typically advised the homeowner that HASNY could assist him or her with a loan modification. In other cases, homeowners were advised that a loan modification could not be completed, but a particular type of short sale could be arranged in which the homeowner would sell the property to a third party, Launch Development, and then a relative of the homeowner could repurchase the property from Launch Development within 90 days. Homeowners typically were told they could remain in their homes throughout the entire process. REID and MAHARAJ both participated in these meetings.
After an initial meeting with homeowners, a closing typically was scheduled during which the homeowner would meet with another co-conspirator who was described as the homeowner’s attorney for the transaction. The homeowners, who had been led to believe that they were about to receive a loan modification or would be able to transfer their property to a trusted relative, were encouraged to sign documents, which in some cases were blank. Unbeknownst to the homeowners, by signing some of those documents, they were agreeing to sell their homes to a Hillside Business – often Launch Development – and would be forced to vacate their homes soon thereafter.
As part of the fraud, the Hillside Fraud Team often used Uniform Commercial Code liens to coerce victims into participating in these deals. BOUBERT filed liens on homeowner properties, even when those homeowners owed no debt to a Hillside Business.
After purchasing a property from a homeowner, members of the Hillside Fraud Team typically appeared at the homeowner’s residence and demanded that the homeowner vacate the premises, or commenced eviction proceedings against the homeowner, or both.
The Hillside Fraud Team generated millions of dollars as a result of their fraudulent scheme.
For the criminal complaint, see USA v. Boubert, et al.
<< Home