Monday, July 18, 2016

NYC Feds Squeeze Guilty Pleas Out Of Nine Ex-Employees Of Buffalo-Based Debt Collector Accused Of "Juicing The Balance", Using False Threats & Representations To Fleece Thousands Out Of Over $31 Million

From the Office of the U.S. Attorney (New York City):
  • Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that HEATHER GASTA, a/k/a “Heather Brez,” a former manager of a Buffalo, New York-based debt collection company (the “Company”), pled guilty [] to participating in a scheme to coerce thousands of victims across the country through false threats and representations into paying a total of more than $31 million to the Company to resolve debts these victims purportedly owed.

    Earlier [], COLUMBUS SIMMONS, a/k/a “Timothy Ham,” and WILLIAM CLARK, a/k/a “John Harvey,” two former debt collectors at the Company, also pled guilty for their roles in the debt collection scheme. GASTA, SIMMONS, and CLARK each pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and one count of wire fraud before U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla. To date, nine former employees of the Company have pled guilty to participating in the scheme.

    U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said: “As they admitted in court this week, these defendants were key members of a band of predatory debt collectors, or as they called themselves, ‘the elite team.’ Armed with telephones and a litany of threatening lies, they and others at the Company coerced thousands of desperate, debt-ridden victims to send them tens of millions of dollars. In a practice they called ‘juicing the balance,’ these defendants also falsely inflated the debt owed by the victims so they could collect even more.”

    According to the allegations contained in the Indictment to which GASTA, SIMMONS, and CLARK pled guilty and statements made during their plea proceedings:

    Between 2010 and February 2015, GASTA, SIMMONS, CLARK, and their co-defendants (collectively, the “defendants”) routinely attempted to trick and coerce thousands of victims throughout the United States into paying millions of dollars in consumer debts through a variety of false statements and false threats.

    The defendants, using a variety of aliases, falsely told victims, among other things, that:
  • (1) the Company was affiliated with local government and law enforcement agencies, including the “county” and the district attorney’s office; 
  • (2) the consumers had committed criminal acts, such as “wire fraud” or “check fraud,” and if they did not pay the debt immediately, warrants or other process would be issued, at which point they would be arrested or hauled into court; 
  • (3) the victims would have their driver’s licenses suspended if they did not pay their debts immediately; 
  • (4) the Company was a law firm or mediation firm and that the Company’s employees were working with lawyers, a law firm, mediators, or arbitrators; and 
  • (5) a civil lawsuit would be filed, or was pending, against the victims for failing to pay their debts.